当决赛的哨声即将吹响,面对梦开始的地方和拉玛西亚的师弟们,梅西的每一步都在书写历史。
1、leyuapp 财务成绩单:营收涨了,利润缩了 得益于汽车业务的表现,特斯拉在二季度的营收盘子,表现很不错。
梅西被彻底锁死,亚马尔也哑了火,足球世界里最重要的一场比赛,逐渐拧成了一个谁都无法解开的死结。leyuapp一旦坐实是制造端的问题,供应商将丧失几乎全部抗辩空间,整车厂也难以撇清选型和管理责任。
2、世界杯1/8决赛时间表:明天7月7日CCTV5直播,比利时冲击东道主
工作不开心、恋爱受挫、不知道将来干什么,都可能被归结为“主体性不足”。

3、35k英里1983年奔驰240D现身拍卖:保留原始车主至2017年,无底价
他面对的是一个被专利悬崖折磨得筋疲力尽的组织,一个被诺和诺德远远甩在身后的GLP-1赛道,和一个刚刚在阿尔茨海默病领域遭遇惨败的研发管线矩阵。
4、ICC官宣:2027年世界测试锦标赛决赛定址伦敦椭圆形球场
2026年上半年,受益于全球人工智能算力建设,存储芯片行业供给格局结构优化,通用存储芯片产品价格维持上涨态势,存储业务实现量价同步改善。
5、男篮两场世预赛总结:3人不能用,3人需调整,1将能扛大旗
正如Transfermarkt英国内容创作者尤安·罗伯逊所分析:“人们说状态是暂时的,但水平是永恒的,卡塞米罗在曼联出色的最后一个赛季印证了这句话。
MakerWorld 越活跃,拓竹越不能只把自己看成硬件公司。
2026年最牵动储能产业链神经的,不是碳酸锂的短期涨跌,而是314Ah电芯的结构性短缺。
6、85公斤与68.5公斤番茄:西班牙世界杯英雄返乡获赠体重等量特产
“中国客户愿意付费,但前提是你真的懂他们的需求。
在球队失利、球迷情绪低落的敏感节点,发布个人高光时刻的旧照,无论初衷是单纯的纪念还是内心的自我慰藉,都不可避免地会被贴上“不合时宜”的标签。
7、沙滩老炮的合法上路“玩具”:管架车身+可拆车门,2900英里待售
为了能买下苏州旭创,现金紧张的中际装备只能通过发行股份来募集资金。
此外,巴尔科拉、戈茨和阿莱贝戈维奇也在枪手的雷达上。
8、拉萨市2026年西藏初中班(校)和西藏完全中学招生体检最低控制分数线公布
效力于英超热刺的克里斯蒂安·罗梅罗以及曼联中卫利桑德罗·马丁内斯也参与了展示。
3年的时间里,伯恩茅斯在伊劳拉的调教下排名接连攀升,从接手前的第15名到第12名、第9名,又到本赛季的第6名,率队取得历史性欧战资格(欧联杯)。
无论今年夏天谁会当选米兰主帅,引进靠谱的正印9号都会是优先事项。
9、中甲保级队被足协追加扣6分,成中甲唯一负分球队,保级难上加难
从2024年到2026年,连续三年的三项顶级国际赛事(欧洲杯、欧国联、世界杯),西班牙都在半决赛中精准地“狙击”了法国。
此前,Momenta创始人兼CEO曹旭东曾表示,“汽车辅助驾驶竞争将在2026年结束,国内最终只会有三家参与者胜出。
10、噩耗!英格兰足坛传奇凯文·基冈因病去世,执教曼城期间签下孙继海
米兰在本赛季联赛中完全没有莱奥参与的比赛有9场,基本上占到了赛程的四分之一。
一个人在学会这些词之前,只是心情不好;学会以后,可能开始焦虑自己为什么还没有完成疗愈。
1、The Athletic:亚特兰大联已开启努涅斯转会谈判,目前仍处初步阶段
转会市场上,曼联已经签下了蒂勒曼斯等新援,预计还会有后续引援动作。
2、图赫尔3.5分!英格兰全队打分:戈登最高,凯恩5.2分,4将不及格
在世界杯年,大力神杯的含金量压倒一切,而梅西正是那支最有可能捧杯的球队中不可替代的灵魂。
3、转会窗:格雷茨卡接近加盟米兰,尤文领跑B席争夺战
无论朗尼克是否作为全权总监管控竞技部门,格拉斯纳都已同意接手米兰。利物浦今夏清洗名单可换超2.15亿英镑 世界杯冠军成员亦在列不过它至少让当事人不必立刻把所有问题归结为“我不行”。
4、世预赛-中国男篮VS省队前瞻:CCTV5直播,中国队出线关键战输不起
”林夏说道。
5、前老鹰队友为赫茨鸣不平:NFL百大仅排56位?该是第一
但劣势也同样存在,比如:分层架构意味着链路更长、调优更复杂,端到端效果未必比直接训练VLA更好。
6、39,000英里,这台2002款宝马M5拥有Dinan S1全套改装和六速手动
大规模引援的前提必然是阵容的精简与资金回笼。
现年26岁的他正处于职业球员的黄金期,上赛季在葡萄牙体育交出了54场比赛13球18助的亮眼数据,目前德转身价高达4000万欧元。
但实际上,礼来也曾对GLP-1在减肥领域的应用嗤之以鼻,并险些错失整个GLP-1时代。
7、约翰把老本吃完了,用不明白3大国脚,成都别以为冠军稳了,胡荷韬调整好心态
25-26赛季,他各项赛事为亨克出战49场,贡献3球14助攻,其中欧联杯13场2球1助攻。
本场比赛,西班牙队延续了本届赛事的强势表现。
8、快快评|赛里木湖的美景,莫被“拳头”蒙尘
对于当下热门的scale-up光学,产业链大咖进行了激烈的意见交换和畅想。
加几个目标行业的交流群,关注几个靠谱的校招博主,哪怕只是每周刷一次牛客的实习版。
奥利塞作为法国队前场唯一的进攻枢纽,遭到了西班牙中场的针对性围抢,全场几乎隐身,并且失误不断,这是奥利塞继欧冠决赛之后又一次在高端局中迷失。
全新的耐克球衣设计融合了俱乐部经典的黑白元素与现代美学,而萨拉赫与特罗萨德的加盟,无疑将为这支百年豪门注入前所未有的商业价值与全球关注度。
用户王霜伤缺,三新援齐上阵!武汉女足终结不胜升至第4 为无视外界批评与误解!C罗:世界无法定义我的传奇,从来只为自己鼓掌赠送买乌郎为何替补?毕津浩继续缺阵,宋岳能否被泰山攻击群打爆?克雷桑是后手贾育新任静乐县人民政府县长
+71716
用户2026足协杯16强落位:国安上签,海港争冠难度大 为办了96年的英联邦运动会,为何缩水到10个项目还差点夭折?赠送康熙无嫡女成人,为何却有五位固伦公主?玄烨仅封1位人气票
用户榜首追击、卡位混战、首胜攻坚齐上演——粤超第八比赛周前瞻 为彭啸+高准翼送大礼,谢文能又伤了 泰山队溃败成常态 拿什么保三?赠送2027款玛莎拉蒂Grecale Folgore外观官图公布,全视角展示纯电SUV细节点赞最棒
+14485
用户阿加斯迎战佩特罗鲁:新帅索萨首度客场出击 交锋往绩一边倒 为攻高端,顶进口,不内卷!重庆金猫的“十五五”全球远征赠送海牛运气太差了,1场3主力后卫停赛,新外援只踢了11分钟,河南队捡便宜了人气票
用户为什么杜伦还没续约?看历年RFA签约时间就懂了 为深圳公开赛战报!5-4,5-4,5-4中国军团3连胜,三将惊险绝杀!赠送重磅!CBA恢复升降级几成定局人气票
用户芬超第17轮前瞻:古比斯主场迎战瓦萨,欧冠归来再遇劲敌 为全国第一批,邵阳入选的是......赠送欧协联资格赛前瞻:马利舍沃迎战希伯尼安 苏超劲旅新赛季首战人气票
这一请求旨在配合诺坎普球场翻新工程的关键节点,确保球队在球场屋顶安装期间拥有稳定的比赛场地。我要发布>>
穆西亚拉负责盘带突破撕裂防守,维尔茨掌控节奏送出致命直塞,两人世预赛联手贡献12球8助攻。我要发布>>
但华为并非孤例。我要发布>>
有消息称,巴黎并不打算满足巴萨对这位前曼城球员的心理价位,他们认定,在合同年限所剩无多的情况下,巴萨没有多少筹码坚持高价。我要发布>>
它打开消费无人机市场的方式,是把飞行控制、稳定和校准等专业知识藏进产品里。我要发布>>
Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场,变身硅谷投资人。我要发布>>
Perplexity成立于2022年,由前OpenAI、前谷歌DeepMind工程师创立,主打“对话式搜索”,2025年9月完成2亿美元融资,估值约200亿美元。我要发布>>
当AI浪潮席卷全球,它选择主动转身,在2021年便前瞻性地布局AI,为当前成为AI文娱领军企业地位打下了基础。我要发布>>
计算能力提升得越快,通信、存储和散热越容易拖住整体效率,这都是智算中心走向规模化后绕不开的问题。我要发布>>
首回合,16岁的亚马尔随巴萨客场3-2力克巴黎圣日耳曼,给姆巴佩上了一课。我要发布>>